The rapid assessment of chemical hazards to human health, with reduced reliance on mammalian testing, is essential in the 21st century. Early life stage zebrafish have emerged as a leading model in the field due to their amenability to high throughput developmental toxicity testing while retaining the benefits of using a whole vertebrate organism with high homology with humans. Zebrafish are particularly well suited for a variety of study areas that are more challenging in other vertebrate model systems including microbiome work, transgenerational studies, gene-environment interactions, molecular responses, and mechanisms of action. The high volume of data generated from zebrafish screening studies is highly valuable for QSAR modeling and dose modeling for use in predictive hazard assessment. Recent advancements and challenges in using early life stage zebrafish for predictive human toxicology are reviewed. View publication

There have been more than 70 FDA-approved drugs to target the ATP binding site of kinases, mainly in the field of oncology. These compounds are usually developed to target specific kinases, but in practice, most of these drugs are multi-kinase inhibitors that leverage the conserved nature of the ATP pocket across multiple kinases to increase their clinical efficacy. To utilize kinase inhibitors in targeted therapy and outside of oncology, a narrower kinome profile and an understanding of the toxicity profile is imperative. This is essential when considering treating chronic diseases with kinase targets, including neurodegeneration and inflammation. This will require the exploration of inhibitor chemical space and an in-depth understanding of off-target interactions. We have developed an early pipeline toxicity screening platform that uses supervised machine learning (ML) to classify test compounds’ cell stress phenotypes relative to a training set of on-market and withdrawn drugs. Here, we apply it to better understand the toxophores of some literature kinase inhibitor scaffolds, looking specifically at a series of 4-anilinoquinoline and 4-anilinoquinazoline model libraries.
View publication

The 4-anilinoquin(az)oline is a well-known kinase inhibitor scaffold incorporated in clinical inhibitors including gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, and lapatinib, all of which have previously demonstrated activity against chordoma cell lines in vitro. We screened a focused array of compounds based on the 4-anilinoquin(az)oline scaffold against both U-CH1 and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor resistant U-CH2. To prioritize the hit compounds for further development, we screened the compound set in a multiparameter cell health toxicity assay. The de-risked compounds were then screened against a wider panel of patient derived cell lines and demonstrated low micromolar efficacy in cells. We also investigated the properties that gave rise to the toxophore markers, including the structural and electronic features, while optimizing for EGFR in-cell target engagement. These de-risked leads present a potential new therapeutic avenue for treatment of chordomas and new chemical tools and probe compound 45 (UNC-CA359) to interrogate EGFR mediated disease phenotypes. View publication

Excipients serve as vehicles, preservatives, solubilizers, and colorants for drugs, food, and cosmetics. They are considered to be inert at biological targets; however, several reports suggest that some could interact with human targets and cause unwanted effects. We investigated 40 commonly used drug excipients for cellular stress in the AsedaSciences® SYSTEMETRIC® Cell Health Screen, which was developed to estimate toxicity risk of small molecular entities (SMEs). The screen uses supervised machine learning (ML) to classify test compound cell stress phenotypes relative to a training set of on-market and withdrawn drugs. While 80% (n = 32) of the excipients did not show elevated risk in a broad, but pharmacologically relevant, concentration range (5 nM to 100 μM), we identified 20% (n = 8) with elevated risk. This group included two mercury containing preservatives, propyl gallate, methylene blue, benzethonium chloride, and cetylpyridinium chloride, all known for previously reported safety issues. All compounds were tested in parallel in an in vitro assay panel regularly used to investigate off-target effects of drug candidates. Target engagement in this assay panel confirmed risk-indicative biological activity for the same excipients, except propyl gallate, which may have a separate, interesting mechanism. We conclude that the SYSTEMETRIC Cell Health Screen, in conjunction with in vitro pharmacological profiling, can provide a fast and cost effective methodology for first line testing of SMEs, including excipients, to avoid cellular damage, particularly in the GI, where they are represented in high concentrations.
View publication